<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On whose shoulders stands Atlas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idiozeitgeist.com/2011/03/06/on-whose-shoulders-stands-atlas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idiozeitgeist.com/2011/03/06/on-whose-shoulders-stands-atlas/</link>
	<description>The blog of St. Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 02:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://idiozeitgeist.com/2011/03/06/on-whose-shoulders-stands-atlas/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 20:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idiozeitgeist.com/?p=609#comment-926</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Broadly speaking, what would Rand&#039;s counterargument be?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broadly speaking, what would Rand&#8217;s counterargument be?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://idiozeitgeist.com/2011/03/06/on-whose-shoulders-stands-atlas/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idiozeitgeist.com/?p=609#comment-915</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Written exactly like someone who doesn&#039;t understand Rand at all, or who choses not to understand her.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rand has numerous flaws in her ideas, but this isn&#039;t one of them. In fact, this particular claim is one she specifically tears into bloody bits in her writing, and very effectively at that. Trying to attack her from a point of strength is either a play to appeal to those who haven&#039;t read her books but would like to hate her anyway, or misses the point totally. Or both.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, one of the best parts of Rand is that, just when you really want to hate her, just when you want to claim &quot;but who would actually say anything that transparently stupid, and indeed, who would believe that argument&quot;, her enemies appear and speak exactly like bad guys in her fiction, almost word for word. Who needs Ellsworth Toohey when you have reality.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written exactly like someone who doesn&#8217;t understand Rand at all, or who choses not to understand her.</p>

<p>Rand has numerous flaws in her ideas, but this isn&#8217;t one of them. In fact, this particular claim is one she specifically tears into bloody bits in her writing, and very effectively at that. Trying to attack her from a point of strength is either a play to appeal to those who haven&#8217;t read her books but would like to hate her anyway, or misses the point totally. Or both.</p>

<p>BTW, one of the best parts of Rand is that, just when you really want to hate her, just when you want to claim &#8220;but who would actually say anything that transparently stupid, and indeed, who would believe that argument&#8221;, her enemies appear and speak exactly like bad guys in her fiction, almost word for word. Who needs Ellsworth Toohey when you have reality.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
